• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Although h­ailed as an interesting portrayal of the moral dilemmas facing Allied POWs held captive by the Japanese in World War II, "The Bridge on the River Kwai" (1957) was seen as a slap within the face to one esteemed, real-life British officer. Director and actor Mel Gibson's portrayal of Scotland's hero William Wallace mesmerized audiences and received the movie 5 Oscars. Something about this formulation should carry some resonance with American audiences. Interestingly, "The Far Horizons" (1955) does something very just like "Pocahontas." It tries to create this tension between a native American girl and سعر الذهب اليوم a white explorer, both of whom are nicely-identified in U.S. Not solely that, however the movie depicts Custer turning to alcohol in 1865, when in reality he swore off the stuff after an embarrassing incident in 1862. Modern viewers take concern with the film's stereotypical, one-dimensional depiction of Native Americans as nicely, significantly Chief Crazy Horse, the Lakota Sioux struggle chief. The movie depicts villainous business males mendacity concerning the presence of usd gold price in the Black Hills to oust the tribes living there; in fact, there was gold on this region. Although it may be true, as Smith later said, that Pocahontas intervened to save lots of his life, she was solely 10 or 11 years previous when she made the gesture - the film depicts them each as adults.

Here's where the story takes a flip that may maintain the 1421 principle's status as debatable for years to return. Were this film not directed towards youngsters (who are less prone to know the real story), it might perhaps be dismissed as harmless historic fiction. But because it portrays real historical figures, critics complain that "Pocahontas" simply misleads youngsters and interferes with the events they'll later find out about. Those who knew the real story objected that it tainted Toosey's honorable status. The story reaches its climax when Pocahontas throws herself on Smith to avoid wasting his life.S. This occurred in 1995, when Disney launched its personal model of the Pocahontas story. When "Braveheart" came out in 1995, it was an immediate success. Errors of omission notably incense critics, such as how Stone unnoticed the truth that Garrison's key testimony was introduced on by drugging and hypnosis. But controversy really ignited in 1991 when Oliver Stone released­ the movie "JFK," which posits that one fringe principle surrounding the homicide is reality and follows New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison as he investigates it.

That is despite the fact that Maximus (the main character portrayed by Russell Crowe) is fictional. The movie centers across the character of British commander Col. The movie centers on the famous expedition of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, who have been sent by President Thomas Jefferson to discover the Louisiana Territory for the United States. In the film, Sacagawea and Clark fall in love while traversing hostile territory and battling the jealous villain Toussaint Charbonneau. If you are in any respect acquainted with the story, you recognize that alongside the way, they encountered a really helpful girl from the Shoshone tribe named Sacagawea. Persons are of­ten shocked to learn the way little historians learn about probably the most celebrated playwright of the English language, William Shakespeare. She proved extremely useful to the occasion but never - so far as historians know - made a move on William Clark. Historians discover this conjecture about Wallace and Isabella a bit of exhausting to swallow on condition that, at the time the film is set, Isabella was a child. Against all odds, Wallace commands a gorgeous victory against the English in the Battle of Stirling Bridge. Nicholson arrives in a Japanese POW camp, where the Japanese are forcing the males to build a bridge that will likely be instrumental in their navy ways.

Much to the surprise of his fellow officers and to the delight of the Japanese commander, Nicholson seeks to improve his men's morale by forcing them to build a stable, effectively-constructed bridge. Not until the dramatic end does the obsessive Nicholson recognize the folly of assisting the enemy in struggle and destroy the bridge. His admirers declare he did the best he could to keep his men safe whereas not giving aid to the enemy. Filmmakers ceaselessly admit their lapses in historical correctness however claim to have captured the spirit of the truth. Other instances, filmmakers need to make a point a couple of trendy subject or ignite wartime patriotism by invoking analogous occasions of the previous, even if that means bending details. The filmmakers fully fabricated the idea that love blossomed between them, and historians dismiss this idea out of hand. We've gathered 10 films that many historians find insufferable and others just find laughable.